In the era of information bombing, news and comments can be widespreaded no more than a second. However, I doubt if so many people who comment on the internet are really know the whole fact of one issue, or just judge something based on little aspect and insight of the thing. In hence, there is a new theorem called " virus spread of information "which describes the situation of the way of twitter like thing spreading distorted news.

The tragedy of mass media is that it is losing its public convince. Various scandals of the media cooperation have occupied the headline of newspaper, and how do we know the news we are looking through is not distorted by the sponsors of this newspaper? Media should be the third interest party of the society, however,  some have already been the client of some governments and political purposes. So the crowded do never make any judgment before you knowing the every detail, especially those persons who have the big and loud voice in the society. Anyone should be responsible for his words and comments. Even what he is talking about is totally none of his business, since he has intervened in it, then he has to take the outcomes of his interference.

For example, the issue of Guomeimei is a controversial issue. I just know a little fraction of the thing from the newspaper and TV news. I not dare to comment Guo meimei is a good girl or not, because I cannot conclude a plausible result based on my collection of information. So I am cautious about my behavior and comments on the thing thoug I am nobody.

There is one trap in which the modern people are easily to fall is convenience of expressing information on the internet. Someone does not form his own insights and just straightforward to retransmit someone else’s already-comments. I do not favor of this way of analyzing a social problem, especially for those who are studying the social science and aiming to be a famous insightful commenter. A good way is to collect profound information first, this is the premise of doing any analysis.